Monday, March 19, 2012

Insert text field problem

We have a database consisting of one table that is used to store application
reports. The reports are stored in a text field in the table. The size of th
e
database is around 17 Gig and is set to auto-grow. The logical drive(part of
a SAN) has 25 Gig free. Last week, we has trouble inserting rows into the
table. We were able to insert reports that were 5K in size, but unable to
insert reports that were 6K. We deleted some of the reports from the table
and now things seem to be fine.
What can cause this?Gary,
Have you recently ran a DBCC CHECKDB on the database containing the table or
a DBCC CHECKTABLE on the individual table itself?
As a side note, you might check out Reporting Services for the future of
report generation.
Reporting Services Home
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/reporting/default.mspx
HTH
Jerry
"Gary" <Gary@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:36087812-0920-45AC-955D-E283549391AE@.microsoft.com...
> We have a database consisting of one table that is used to store
> application
> reports. The reports are stored in a text field in the table. The size of
> the
> database is around 17 Gig and is set to auto-grow. The logical drive(part
> of
> a SAN) has 25 Gig free. Last week, we has trouble inserting rows into the
> table. We were able to insert reports that were 5K in size, but unable to
> insert reports that were 6K. We deleted some of the reports from the table
> and now things seem to be fine.
> What can cause this?|||We did run DBCC CHECKDB and everything looked ok. Did not run DBCC
CHECKTABLE. We are moving toward Reporting Services. What should I look for
in the DBCC CHECKTABLE?
"Jerry Spivey" wrote:

> Gary,
> Have you recently ran a DBCC CHECKDB on the database containing the table
or
> a DBCC CHECKTABLE on the individual table itself?
> As a side note, you might check out Reporting Services for the future of
> report generation.
> Reporting Services Home
> http://www.microsoft.com/sql/reporting/default.mspx
> HTH
> Jerry
> "Gary" <Gary@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:36087812-0920-45AC-955D-E283549391AE@.microsoft.com...
>
>|||Gary,
CHECKDB is a superset of CHECKTABLE so if you're already run CHECKDB there
is no need to run CHECKTABLE.
HTH
Jerry
"Gary" <Gary@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1B00B83D-AC11-46D4-831F-E6A7BC5DEA5F@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> We did run DBCC CHECKDB and everything looked ok. Did not run DBCC
> CHECKTABLE. We are moving toward Reporting Services. What should I look
> for
> in the DBCC CHECKTABLE?
> "Jerry Spivey" wrote:
>

No comments:

Post a Comment